Closer Look at MongoDB vs MySQL

Closer Look at MongoDB and MySQL

MongoDB is an open-source, document-based database that stores information in JSON-like documents. MySQL is a relational database that uses SQL (Structured Query Language) for queries. Both MongoDB and MySQL are widely used in software development today, but there are some differences between them when it comes to scaling, performance, and security - so let's take a closer look!

MySQL

Oracle's MySQL is a popular, free, and open-source relational database management system (RDBMS). MySQL, like other relational systems, stores data in tables and rows, enforces referential integrity, and provides data access via structured query language (SQL). When users need to retrieve data from a MySQL database, they must create a SQL query that joins multiple tables together to create the desired view of the data.

Database schemas and data models must be defined in advance, and data must conform to this schema in order to be stored in the database. This rigid approach to data storage provides some level of security, but at the expense of flexibility. If a new type or format of data needs to be stored in the database, schema migration must take place, which can become complex and costly as the database grows in size.

Features of MySQL

  • MySQL is a DBMS system that is driven by the community.
  • Compatible with all major platforms and languages, as well as middleware
  • It supports multi-version concurrency control.
  • Conforms to the ANSI SQL standard
  • SSL allows for log-based and trigger-based replication.
  • Object-oriented and compliant with ANSI-SQL2008
  • Design with multiple layers and independent modules
  • Fully multi-threaded, utilizing kernel threads
  • Servers are provided in the embedded database or client-server configurations.
  • Includes built-in tools for query and space analysis.
  • It can handle any quantity of data, up to and including 50 million rows.
  • MySQL runs on a variety of UNIX and Linux platforms.

MongoDB

MongoDB is also free and open source, but its design principles differ from those of traditional relational systems. MongoDB, often referred to as a non-relational (or NoSQL) system, takes a significantly different approach to data storage, representing information as a series of JSON-like documents (actually stored as binary JSON, or BSON), as opposed to relational systems' table and row format.

MongoDB documents are made up of a series of key/value pairs of various types, such as arrays and nested documents; the main difference is that the structure of the key/value pairs in a given collection can vary from document to document. Because documents self-describe, this more adaptable approach is possible.

Features of MongoDB

  • Each database has collections, which include documents.
  • Each document can be unique, with a varied number of fields. Each document's size and content may differ from one another.
  • MongoDB's document structure is based on how developers generate classes and objects in their different programming languages.
  • A schema is not required for rows. Fields can be built on the fly instead.
  • MongoDB makes it easier to depict hierarchical connections, store arrays, and other more complicated structures.

Security

MongoDB employs role-based access control (RBAC) with a broad range of privileges. Authentication, auditing, and authorization are among its security features. Furthermore, Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) can be used for encryption. SSL/TLS ensures the security of data access.

MySQL, on the other hand, employs a security paradigm based on privileges (PBSM). It authenticates a user and provides access to certain databases such as CREATE, SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, and so on. MySQL also employs SSL-encrypted connections between clients and the server. 

 

Conclusion

In the end, MongoDB is not a replacement for MySQL, but it can be used as a complement. It’s an excellent candidate for storing data that doesn’t require complex queries and joins, like log files or metadata about your application. For applications that do require complex queries and joins (like relational databases), MongoDB offers a very rich interface that allows you to query your data in any way imaginable — even through JavaScript!

MySQL is well-organized because of its flexibility, excellent performance, dependable data protection, and simplicity in data management. Proper data indexing can help you handle performance issues, improve engagement, and assure resilience.

However, if your data is unstructured and difficult to manage, or if pre-defining your schema is difficult for you, MongoDB is the superior choice. Furthermore, if you need to handle a huge amount of data and store it as documents, MongoDB will come in handy!

Related Articles

MongoDB vs PostgreSQL: A Comparison

MongoDB Backup: Everything You Need to Know

How to Create a Database on MongoDB

Ready to secure your backups today?

Try for free